There was Dad in California fighting against his judge to be the first family/juvenile dependency court case to be decided by a jury but his son aged out of the...
Laws that place restrictions on our constitutional rights need to be required to stay "narrowly tailored". This prevents unwarranted governmental interference (UGI) and thus protects our constitutional rights from governmental...
California law mandates "shared parenting" and a presumption that "both parents are 'fit"" which is supposed to be overcome. The low standard of evidence makes it easy for an...
Yes! Judges use case law to determine how other judges interpreted a law given the same or similar "facts". This is appropriate for criminal and civil cases. However, family law...
There is a serious emotional fallout with potential lifelong consequences when a "fit" parent is treated as unsafe and loses the right to be a parent. This is preventable by...
ICWA vs. California "family" and juvenile dependency "cps" courts is a battle that native families keep losing....
"Hard-to Place" foster children were treatly very badly during the pandemic and need to be revaluated as to whether or not they can safely return to their families under the...
The hidden truth that is no longer really hidden now that the Family First Prevention Services Act is finally being implemented is that many foster children are safer with family...
Hearsay became evidence in family, juvenile dependency and probate courts because that is what judges wanted to see happen. ...
When those who risk their lives to protect our rights, lose those rights in our family and juvenile dependency courts, that is a travesty that should not be tolerated. ...