Criminal courts are accusing family and juvenile dependency courts of unwarranted governmental interference. More importantly there is a serious bias in these CPS courts against the underrepresented children...
Not yet, but there is a Dad in California that is currently fighting against his judge to be the first family/juvenile dependency court case to be decided by a jury....
Restrictions on our constitutional rights need to stay "narrowly tailored" to prevent unwarranted governmental interference (UGI) and protect constitutional rights from ongoing governmental overreach...
Yes, our state run family and juvenile dependency courts chose AFCC psychologists and mental health professionals over churches to help families in crisis because of divorce. Churches failed to protect...
California law mandates "shared parenting" and a presumption that "both parents are 'fit"" which is supposed to be overcome. The low standard of evidence makes it easy for an...
Yes! Judges use case law to determine how other judges interpreted a law given the same or similar "facts". This is appropriate for criminal and civil cases. However, family law...
It teaches the child that something is wrong with a parent, who otherwise has no risk factors, and leads to scorn, disdain, contempt and disregard for that fit Mom...
ICWA or the federal Indian Child Welfare Act told CA to keep Native American children with their families. It failed. Jury trials rights for these parents will succeed. ...
For the State of Washington, here is a recent news clip on their plight. Hopefully someone will investigate the State of California and what happened to our foster children...
No one can answer that for you, but of course there is a big difference between an ex spouse (usually), and the State of California....